Tuesday, February 7, 2017

February 8th, 2017: Gender Roles

This week's articles written by Noah Berlatsky and Emily Martin provide the readers with a closer look at how our cultural views toward gender roles affect society. After analyzing these readings, I believe the goal of both Berlatsky and Martin is not to simply express their personal opinions towards the ideal desires of men and women, but rather to show the readers that their outlooks on men and women are severely effected by cultural norms and that we should looked past them while we shape our own wants. Martin's "The Egg and the Sperm" highlights the extent of cultural stereotypes in society by showing how its presence in the biological study of gender shows that gender bias exists even at the cellular level. Analyzing reproductive research from several different scientists and time frames, Martin points out the powerful and dominant descriptions of the sperm versus the weak and wasteful descriptions of the egg. This goes to show that gender stereotypes are something that is constantly being etched into our minds, and it serves as a call for the readers to have an open mind about the gender identity of themselves and others and leave the cultural bias out of it. I think Martin disagrees with the typical binary view of gender that limits people to act one way or the other; instead she thinks it should be approached with more individualism. Berlatsky's article, on the other hand, describes gender roles in a different manner by analyzing the femininity of two protagonist from two incredibly popular book series, but the overall idea of his article serves a similar purpose as Martin's study. Bella Swan from the "Twilight" saga and Katniss Everdeen from "The Hunger Games" trilogy have almost polar opposite characteristics from each other in regards to femininity. Bella is portrayed as the typical girl, requiring constant attention from dominant male forces, while Katniss, on the other hand, is viewed as strong power figure that must work her hardest to survive. While highlighting these obvious differences in the protagonists' personalities, Berlatsky also shows how these characters are acclaimed and criticized by critics and fans. It's pointed out that Katniss and her masculinity receives better critical acclaim then boring Bella due to society's negative view on the female gender role. The author then takes a closer look at these characters, however, and starts to bring light to the fact that they actually might be more similar than it's commonly believed. They both have different desires and strengths, and although their methods of achieving their goals might be different, they do share some similar characteristics as females. I think the author's overall purpose is to show their individual desires, and show the readers that judging their personalities based on stereotypical views of the female gender role isn't the way to go. The world tends to put these characters in the female category when forming opinions towards them; the category that classifies every female as a feminine figure. Like Martin's study, Berlatsky's article gives the reader the idea to view people of both sexes with more individualism. These readings show that people's wants and personalities are crafted on their own and aren't based on the physical organs that define our sex. People should want what they truly desire, rather than what society tells them they need.

2 comments:

  1. I agree with your introduction when we said that both authors want to “show the readers that their outlooks on men and women are severely effected by culture norms.” I felt like Berlatsky was trying to make us decide that Katniss had more masculine characteristics while Bella was more feminine. Showing that Bella was more of an emotional mess who always relied on a man definitely reinforces culture norms like how we discussed in class on Monday. The way we look at Katniss is that she is very independent and strong; characteristics a man has. But we don’t criticize her for being manly, we look up to her like a role model. Someone we rooted on during the movie. “The Egg and the Sperm” showed similar characteristics that women needed men. That “the egg will die within hours unless rescued by sperm.” Which, scientifically that’s not really the reason why, but the author wants us to believe that. I do agree with you that Martin does point out the strengths of the sperm and the weakness of the egg, but then she flips it around in the “New Research, Old Imagery” text that the sperm is actually a weak thing because it can not even break one layer of protection without help of the ejaculation motion and other things. I think the sperm and the egg both have strength and weaknesses, and the author does point that out in the text, so there is really no superior/inferior character.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel that both of the readings reject gender roles. “The Egg and the Sperm,” takes a rather obvious approach of rejecting these roles. The entire passage is illustrating the inequalities between mens’ and womens’ reproductive systems, as portrayed by scientific textbooks. Usually society views scientific information as purely objective, stating the facts of nature, so it is a bit of a surprise when the author tells us that even the information about our internal organs can be biased in the name of gender roles. The author makes a great effort to point out these stereotypes so that they can be noticed by the public and rejected. This author obviously rejects gender norms. The author of “‘Twilight’ vs. ‘Hunger Games,’ : Why Do So Many Grown-ups Hate Bella?” takes a slightly different approach. By outlining two different female characters, a better, tomboyish fighter and a passive, helpless girl, it would appear that the author is rejecting classic gender roles by building up a woman who can take care of herself and putting down a girl who is dependent on her boyfriends. However, instead of resting at this point, the author shows how both characters end up with the opposite of what they originally started with; Bella ends up powerful and strong, and Katniss settles down to have children. By making this point, the author takes a step further in rejecting gender roles. Not only should women not be forced to be passive and girly, but they should also not be forced to be strong and have killer instincts. Women should be free to choose whatever they would like to be, whether it’s a warrior or a housewife. This rejects the ultimate gender role, that women should have to be something. Both of these authors reject gender stereotypes to the best of their ability.

    ReplyDelete