Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Febuary 1st Blog : Cosmic Perspective

In the essay entitled “Cosmic Perspective” by astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson, the author stresses the importance of astronomy in our human experience. Tyson claims that the cosmic view- all that is humble (spiritual but not religious) and what enables us to see beyond our circumstances- comes with a hidden cost. The author claims that when he pauses and reflects on our expanding universe, sometimes he forgets that people walk this world without food or shelter; and he sometimes forgets that every day someone kills or gets killed in “the name of someone else’s conception of God, and that some people… kill in the name of their nation’s needs or wants,” illustrating the idea that most conflicts, from a homicide to a war or revolution, are caused by preconceived beliefs and instances of servitude (for example: serving in an Army backed by a religiously-ran state of government). Tyson only occasionally “forgets” these things because he believes “however big the world is… the universe is even bigger. A depressing thought to some, but a liberating thought to me” (1071). To assess the prompt of the blog, yes, Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s view and insight can be helpful in day-to-day life. He “forgets” these worldly problems, because he focuses on the immense size and dexterity of the expanding universe around us. In a daily way of putting this, we shouldn’t focus on the small problems that affect us in life, but rather you should respect and understand your cosmic path and recognize that it is microscopic, relative to the rest of space in the known universe. The author claims that he thinks of people “not as the masters of space and time but as participants in a great cosmic chain of being” (1072). According to the astrophysicist, we are not below or above any other organism in nature, but instead “we are one with the rest of nature, fitting neither above nor below, but within,” meaning that even Earth itself is one big organism, and humans impact the world around them because they are not only a part of Earth, but they are also a part of the growing universe (1074). This statement affects our everyday life, because humans need other organisms, life forms and natural elements to simply function as a human being on a daily basis. For example, we require oxygen in our system constantly to survive. But humans forget that we require so much from our environment and we continue to pollute and destroy the very organisms that give us life. Tyson firmly states that he believes the day our knowledge of the cosmos stops expanding, we risk regressing to the primitive view of the universe in which the universe, literally and figuratively, revolves around us. The author explains this statement by claiming “In that bleak world, arms-bearing, resource-hungry people and nations would be prone to act on their ‘low contacted prejudices.’ And that would be the last gasp of human enlightenment” (1077). I agree with many of the intelligent statements Tyson promotes in his paper, but much of what he was saying didn’t seem to be any different than Jill Bolte’s deep appreciation for the immense and vast beauty of the right hemisphere of the brain. In this way, Tyson is enthralled and consumed in the ever expanding universe that surrounds us and that every person has in themselves.

2 comments:

  1. In Taylor's "My Stroke of Insight" she describes her encounter with the right side of her brain as "Nirvana" and "La La Land", which I think is different than Tyson's idea that if you focus on the universe you can forget about issues that occur in the daily lives of people here on Earth. It is different because Taylor's experience was one that made her unaware of anything other than joy. With Tyson, he is CONSCIOUSLY choosing to forget about daily issues and focus on the large expansion of the universe. Although both ideas carry similar traits, like Tyson's idea to blend in with the universe and become a single being and Taylor not being able to know where she began and ended, the are very different because one is on purpose while the other is not. Another difference is that Tyson also seems to believe that we have a greater cosmic path beyond Earth and we need not focus on daily problems, while Jill focuses on using the energy from her right hemisphere to spread peace and potentially FIX those exact problems (religious warfare, world hunger etc.). I agree with you that both are similar, but I disagree with you that Tyson's statements are exactly like Taylor's ideas. Although both people are clearly free thinkers, they both have different ideas of how to use those liberal thoughts. Any who, still a great blog in my opinion!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I disagree with some of the stuff Tyler says. one point I disagree with is the notion that he says that the universe is the bigger part of the world. But in my head, I just think of the world since I am not the one exploring the universe and going to different planets. So I am just focused on the part I do no which is just the Earth and the people in it. He does not focus on the things that are happening in daily life because he does not think that is the bigger picture when in reality that should be the bigger picture to us. That is the bigger picture to us because the world is what we know and what we are dealing with everyday, so we should focus on helping what we know in the world rather than focusing on whats going on in the universe, especially because we are not dealing with what is going on in different planets or other things in the universe. He does not want to think about things that will stress him out, kind of like Taylor except Tyson chooses not to think about the different things that happen in life. This is wrong because you can not completely forget about the things that happen in the world because there are things in this world that you have to do and help the world be a better place rather than just thinking about the universe and not the world.

    ReplyDelete