Monday, January 30, 2017
Observing Through the Minds Eye
Having dinner with the Authors that we’ve read on, that are invested on the muse of abstract and objective art connecting them to the view of reality. Fueling a conversation of how we should view life would produce a tasty conversation for the night. Carrying the discussion of the best way to see the world would lead to a well in-depth debate that doesn't truly have a right or wrong answer. Comparison of seeing actual objective reality and how you interpret your own reality. Something that can only be decided by someone's individual view, rather than developing a specific criteria to view life. Whether you can picture it or not it's still a form of reality that may be understood depending how people interpret it. No matter if you see animals in the clouds or just clouds in the sky the reality you see is the reality you develop for yourself. The Authors would agree to this discussion because everyone is unique in their own way and may encounter reality way differently then they may experience themselves. From both point of views I believe they will settle at the point that reality is not a specific settlement that is to be seen through one lens but left to the eye of the beholder.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It was refreshing reading your blog. As I read it, a few questions kept arising in my mind. Is it better that we question and challenge our form of thinking? Can it eventually ruin the simple joys? If everyone did so, would the world become far too complicated and thus create more sadness? Obviously, it is not possible to get every single person to do one thing but I guess what I am trying to say is: When do we stop thinking about thinking and use instinct and impulse? If we introduce and encourage different forms of thinking to children, will they eventually be able to unconsciously know when it is better to think which way?
ReplyDelete-Nayem Cardenas-Lopez